. >> if senator mccain and graham and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me. and i'm happy to have that discussion with them. but for them to go after the u.n. ambassador, who had nothing to do with benghazi? simply making a presentation based on intelligence she received, and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous. >> "outfront" tone, rand paul prosecute kentucky. serves on the homeland security committee. i want to quote this. strongly worded. mr. president, don't think for one minute i don't hold you ultimately responsible for benghazi. i you this failed as commander in chief before, during and after the attack. given what i know now, i have no intentioof promoting anyone who is up to their eyeballs in the benghazi debacle. do you agree, or deoverreact? >> everyone has been emphasized for her to say that this was caused by some crazy low budget movie in l.a. was it caused by terrorism or a movie? obviously, terrorism. the more important question, why were there no marine guarding the ambassador? who made the decision. the month-long desk decision to send